People v. Rice

Mar 17, 2006
Reporters:
,

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.50) and reckless endangerment in the first degree (§ 120.25). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in imposing consecutive sentences (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, that contention lacks merit (see People v Brown, 80 NY2d 361, 363-364 [1992]; see generally People v Montstream, 21 AD3d 1353, 1354 [2005]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Green, JJ.