History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Restifo
366 N.Y.S.2d 66
N.Y. App. Div.
1975
Check Treatment

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court .of Albany-County, rendered October 16, 1972, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree, a. felony.. When this case was previously before us (People v. Res tifo, 44. A D 2d 870), we withheld determination of the appeal and remitted the matter to .the — County. Court, Albany County, for a hearing on the issue of whether defendant had been personally present at the time a suppression hearing had be6h held. After a hearing, the trial court has now found that the defendant was not present 'at the time of the suppression hearing on September 20, 1972. This determination is supported by the evidence in. the record. A. suppression hearing is part of the trial at which the defendant must be present. Since the defendant was absent from the hearing, his' conviction must be reversed. (People v. Anderson, 16 N Y 2d 282.) Judgment reversed, On the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered.. Herlihy, P. J<,'Greenblott, Swéeney, Main and Reynolds, JJ.. concur.,

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Restifo
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 27, 1975
Citation: 366 N.Y.S.2d 66
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.