People v. RembertPeople v. Rembert
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury on the defense of justification is unpreserved for appellate review (see
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a mistrial. Any prejudice to the defendant that might have resulted from the testimony of the prosecution’s witness was alleviated by the trial court’s prompt curative instructions to the jury (see People v Brescia, 41 AD3d 613 [2007]; People v Smith, 23 AD3d 415 [2005]; People v Boston, 296 AD2d 576, 577 [2002]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513, 519 [1983]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Mastro, J.P., Spolzino, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.