History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Raynes
3 Cal. 366
Cal.
1853
Check Treatment
Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

The defendant was the keeper of a common gaming-house, and this action was for the amount required by law for a license, which the defendant had neglected to obtain. It was decided by this court, in the case of “ The People v. Craycroft,” that such an action could not be maintained.

The statute re-enacts the common law, in making this evil occupation a misdemeanor, punishable by fine and imprisonment, and the license is proposed as a sort of compromise for the offence, doubtless with the hope of regulating and thereby diminishing the bad influence of a vice which it is impossible to suppress.

The failure to obtain the license, leaves the party as he would have been at common law, a public wrong-doer, and subject to indictment and punishment.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Raynes
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1853
Citation: 3 Cal. 366
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.