People v. RayPeople v. Ray
The sole argument raised by defendant upon appeal — that the agreed-upon sentence imposed is harsh and excessive — is precluded by defendant‘s unchallenged waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Clerveau, 174 AD3d 1066, 1068 [2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 949 [2019]; People v Perez, 171 AD3d 1309, 1309 [2019]; People v Allen, 165 AD3d 1348, 1348 [2018]). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Mulvey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.