People v. RandallPeople v. Randall
—Appeal by
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the voluntariness of the plea since he never moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Lopez,
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Kazepis,
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., O’Brien, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.