People v. RancePeople v. Rance
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Corbin, 121 AD3d 803 [2014]; People v Bennett, 102 AD3d 881 [2013]). Accordingly, the defendant‘s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the hearing court erred in denying suppression (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Corbin, 121 AD3d 803 [2014]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.