History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Ramirez
43 A.D.3d 1086
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2007
|
Check Treatment

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered September 9, 2004, convicting him of *1087robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

To the extent that the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel involves matter dehors the record, it may not be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Villacreses, 12 AD3d 624, 626 [2004]; People v Aguirre, 304 AD2d 771 [2003]). Insofar as we are able to review the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 565-566 [2000]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]). Mastro, J.P., Covello, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Ramirez
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 18, 2007
Citation: 43 A.D.3d 1086
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.