People v. QuinonesPeople v. Quinones
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence supported the conclusion that defendant knowingly and unlawfully entered a nonpublic area behind a bar in a restaurant, with intent to steal bottles of liquor (see People v Canady, 235 AD2d 290 [1997], lv denied 89 NY2d 1090 [1997]; People v Durecot, 224 AD2d 264 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 878 [1996]; People v Lloyd, 180 AD2d 527, 527-528 [1992], lv denied 79 NY2d 1003 [1992]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.