People v. PyattPeople v. Pyatt
Defendant‘s argument that the attempted assault count was duplicitous because it charged that he and the codefendant committed the crime by means of two separate weapons is unpre
The People concede that defendant was improperly adjudicated a second violent felony offender because that adjudication was based on a predicate conviction of attempted assault in the second degree, which is not a statutory violent felony (People v Gilchrist, 267 AD2d 71 [1999]). The People also concede that indeterminate sentences are required for defendant‘s convictions of criminal possession of a weapon under