History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Proctor
79 N.Y.2d 992
NY
1992
Check Treatment

*994OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Not having raised the issue by motion to vácate or otherwise in the court of first instance, defendant’s argument that there was a failure to comply with the procedures of CPL 400.20 has not been preserved for our review (People v Oliver, 63 NY2d 973; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Defendant’s remaining claim is meritless.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Proctor
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 30, 1992
Citation: 79 N.Y.2d 992
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.