People v. PringlePeople v. Pringle
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: The record supports the suppression court’s determination that the stop of the automobile defendant was driving and the pursuit and detention of defendant and his companions were supported by a reasonable suspicion that a crime had been committed (see, People v Martinez,
We reject the contention that cumulative error deprived defendant of a fair trial and that imposition of consecutive sentences constituted an abuse of discretion. Modification of the sentence is required, however, because the sentencing court erred in directing that the sentence on the third count of the indictment, attempted murder in the second degree (see,