OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant’s statement to Assistant District Attorney Friedman suppressed and a new trial ordered.
It being undisputed that defendant’s second statement was made in custody after he had requested the assistance of counsel, suppression of that statement is required (People v Cunningham, 49 NY2d 203). In the circumstances here presented, reception of that tainted statement into evidence cannot be deemed harmless error (see People v Garofolo, 46
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.
