People v. Prato, 146 A.D.2d 588

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered October 29, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

We have reviewed the arguments raised in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Prato

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Jan 9, 1989

Citations: 146 A.D.2d 588; 536 N.Y.S.2d 707; 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 141

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.