People v. Porter, 268 A.D.2d 538

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered March 6, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in not giving a missing witness charge to the jury. However, the defendant did not raise in the Supreme Court any of the substantive arguments concerning availability or control which he now raises on appeal. Therefore, the defendant’s contentions are not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, in light of the witness’s lack of cooperation with law enforcement officials, and other circumstances of this case, the witness was not under the control of the prosecution such that the People would have been expected to call him (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 429). A missing witness charge was therefore not warranted. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Porter

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Jan 24, 2000

Citations: 268 A.D.2d 538; 701 N.Y.S.2d 649; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 646

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.