History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Pollock
7 N.Y.2d 733
NY
1959
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was pre*734seated and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant Pollock contended that the order of the court impanelling a special jury violated his right to a fair and impartial trial by a jury of his peers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that the order impanelling a special jury did not violate his right under the Fourteenth Amendment. [See 6 N Y 2d 890.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Pollock
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 14, 1959
Citation: 7 N.Y.2d 733
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.