History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Polanco
158 A.D.2d 436
N.Y. App. Div.
1990
Check Treatment

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied *43772 NY2d 918.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Polanco
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 27, 1990
Citation: 158 A.D.2d 436
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.