People v. PittmanPeople v. Pittman
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was charged with two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, class B felonies, after he was arrested for possessing approximately 50 bags of crack cocaine. Following the denial, after a hearing, of his application for participation in a judicial diversion program (hereinafter JDP) (see
The defendant‘s sole argument on appeal is that the County Court erred in denying his application to participate in a JDP. “Courts are afforded great deference in making judicial diversion determinations” (People v Williams, 105 AD3d 1428, 1428 [2013]; see People v Powell, 110 AD3d 1383, 1383 [2013]; People v Buswell, 88 AD3d 1164, 1165 [2011]). The court considered the appropriate statutory factors in making its determination (see