THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v ASTOR PINNOCK, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
2005
792 NYS2d 345
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant‘s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. On this record, we find that he was afforded meaningful representation (see People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]; People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563 [2000]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant‘s remaining contention is without merit.
Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.
