People v. PiercePeople v. Pierce
—Judgment, Supreme
The court’s conduct did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. Its rulings throughout the trial were appropriate and designed to do no more than “enforce propriety, orderliness, decorum and expedition in [the] trial” (People v De Jesus,
During jury selection, the court properly exercised its discretion when, after dismissing one potential juror for cause based on his distasteful prior experience as a juror, the court declined to inquire of other potential jurors whether the dismissed juror had discussed his negative experience with them. There is no indication in the record or reason to believe that any such conversations ever took place.
The court properly exercised its discretion in imposing reasonable time limits on consultations between defendant and counsel concerning the exercise of peremptory challenges (see People v Davis,