People v. Pierce
816 N.Y.S.2d 918
N.Y. App. Div.
2006
Check Treatment

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v UNIESHA PIERCE, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York

816 NYS2d 918

2006

Smith, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered September 7, 2004, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 2 to 6 years. On appeal, appellate counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, we find at least one appellate issue of arguable merit. Where, as here, defendant pleaded guilty but did not waive her right to appeal, she is entitled to argue on appeal that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive (see , revg ). We cannot conclude that raising this issue would be “wholly frivolous,” although we express no opinion about the ultimate merit of the issue (). Accordingly, appellate counsel‘s application to be relieved of his assignment is granted and new counsel will be assigned to address this issue and any other nonfrivolous issue the record may disclose (see ; , lv denied ).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.