People v. PhillipsPeople v. Phillips
— Aрpeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egittо, J.), rendered November 29, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degreе (two counts), attempted murder in the second degree, assault in thе first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the sеcond degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him tо concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 25 years tо life on each murder count, 12 Vz to 25 years on the attempted murder count, 5 to 15 years on the assault count, and 5 to 15 years on eаch criminal possession of a weapon count.
Judgment modifiеd, on the law, by reducing the minimum term of the sentence imposed on thе defendant’s conviction of attempted murder in the second dеgree from 12 ½ to 8 ⅓ years. As so modified, judgment affirmed.
On October 29, 1981, at approximately 8:40 p.m., the defen
The following morning, after obtаining further information about the defendant, the police drove by the Maple Street address, and after observing that this was a private residence, proceeded to the Linden Boulevard address, which was that of a multiple dwelling with about 50 apartments. They entered the lobby area and proceeded through open glass doors down a stairway leading to the basement. At the suppression hеaring, an officer testified that the basement was divided into four or fivе rooms, some with doors. In one room the building’s boiler and fuel were stored; garbage was kept in a second room; and a third room sеrved as a work area. The defendant was observed fully dressed аnd lying on a mattress on the floor of a fourth room, which was dimly lit and had сlothes, as well as a radio, strewn on the floor. An officer arrested the defendant, advising him of his rights from memory. The defendant merely shoоk his head indicating "yes” in response to the officer’s Miranda warnings. Later, the defendant was again given Miranda warnings at the рolice station, and in providing pedigree information, told an оfficer that he lived with his aunt in apartment C8 at 362 Linden Boulevard.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions on this appeal, the supprеssion court properly found, after a hearing, that the defendаnt had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the basement room, and that his arrest without a warrant by the policе was therefore proper (see, Payton v New York,
Also, we find that the Miranda wаrnings given to the defendant in the basement sufficiently advised him of his rights and that defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his rights (see, People v Williams,
The People concede that the defendant’s sentence of 12 Vi to
We find no merit to defendant’s remaining contentions. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.