History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Phelps
67 N.Y.2d 746
NY
1986
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order af*747firmed. Inasmuch as defendant did not object to the admissibility of the radar reading, the issue is not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05). With respect to the failure of the District Attorney to file any submission, we call attention to County Law § 700 and People v Wright (22 AD2d 754, affd 16 NY2d 736, cert denied 384 US 972).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Phelps
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 19, 1986
Citation: 67 N.Y.2d 746
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.