People v. Peterkin

Nov 28, 2005
Versions:23 A.D.3d 678
804 N.Y.S.2d 269

Ordered that the judgment and the amended sentence are affirmed.

The defendant‘s contention concerning the trial court‘s charge on the issue of justification is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Holmes, 12 AD3d 532 [2004]; cf. People v Feuer, 11 AD3d 633 [2004]).

The defendant‘s remaining contention is without merit.

Luciano, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.