People v. Perser

May 16, 2006
Reporters:
,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court‘s determination to ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‍designate the defendant a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]). The court properly assessed the defendant 15 points for drug or alcohol abuse based upon the admissions contained in the presentence report (see People v Davis, 26 AD3d 364 [2006]; People v ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‍Masters, 19 AD3d 387 [2005]; People v Roland, 292 AD2d 271 [2002]). Furthermore, the grand jury minutes supported the court‘s assessment of 10 points against the defendant for having had sexual contact with the victim “under clothing.” In addition, we reject the defendant‘s contention that the settlement entered into by ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‍the parties in the case of Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]) barred the court from assessing five points against him in the release environment category. Although the subject stipulation prohibits points from being assessed in the release environment category against offenders who completed parole or probation prior to ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‍redetermination of their risk levels, the record demonstrates that the defendant‘s term of parole was revoked before completion. Crane, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.