midpage

People v. Perry PendellPeople v. Perry Pendell

New York Court of Appeals
Mar 21, 2019
45 SSM 1
Versions:33 N.Y.3d 972
124 N.E.3d 162
100 N.Y.S.3d 612
2019 NY Slip Op 02152

Submitted by Matthew C. Hug, for appellant.

Submitted by Trevor O. Flike, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed. The contested photographs were sufficiently authenticated through the testimony of the complainant and the law enforcement agents who extracted the photographs from the defendant‘s cell phone and computers (see People v Byrnes, 33 NY2d 343, 347 [1974]). Accordingly, County Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence. Defendant‘s remaining arguments lack merit.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided March 21, 2019

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Perry Pendell
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 21, 2019
Citations: 33 N.Y.3d 972; 124 N.E.3d 162; 100 N.Y.S.3d 612; 2019 NY Slip Op 02152; 45 SSM 1
Docket Number: 45 SSM 1
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In