midpage

People v. PedrazaPeople v. Pedraza

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 8, 1985
Versions:66 N.Y.2d 626
485 N.E.2d 237
495 N.Y.S.2d 30
1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17153

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. It is clear from this record that the sentencing court did consider "the nature and circumstances of the crime and * * * the history and character of the defendant” (Penal Law § 70.02 [2] [c] [i]), correctly including whether, in view of defendant’s physical condition, a sentence of imprisonment would be "unduly harsh”. Thus, it cannot be said that the court failed to exercise its discretion or abused that discretion as a matter of law.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Pedraza
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 8, 1985
Citations: 66 N.Y.2d 626; 485 N.E.2d 237; 495 N.Y.S.2d 30; 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17153
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In