History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Pasquale
54 Misc. 2d 91
N.Y. App. Term.
1967
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Although the judgment of conviction is affirmed, the attention of the Bar is nevertheless called to the following: In this case the prosecutor, in summation, in answer to the statements in defense summation that the main prosecution witness was a liar, stated that his “ Christian background precludes (him) from accusing another human being of being a liar ”, and on a few occasions he begged the Lord’s forgiveness for having to use the word Cod in repeating testimony in which it *92was used. Reference to race, nationality or religion may be prejudicial even though not intended that way, and should be eschewed unless in connection with a matter in issue and unavoidable.

The judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

Concur — Dr Giovanna, Ritchie and Shapiro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Pasquale
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: May 31, 1967
Citation: 54 Misc. 2d 91
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.