THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v COREY PARKS, Appellant.
802 NYS2d 693
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York
May 10, 2005
Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.
Defendant’s claim that his prior criminal act, which formed the basis of his previous youthful offender adjudication, could not be used as an overt act on the instant conspiracy charge, essentially attacks the legal sufficiency of the indictment, i.e., that the conspiracy charge is supported by an improper overt act. Such claim was waived by defendant’s plea of guilty and waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Allen, 86 NY2d 599, 602-603 [1995] ; see also People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 575 [1998]; People v Rodriguez, 227 AD2d 206, 207 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 993 [1996] ; People v Hwi Jin An, 253 AD2d 657 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 949 [1998]; People v Simms, 269 AD2d 788 [2000], lv denied 94 NY2d 952 [2000]). While defendant’s claim that he should have been treated as a youthful offender pursuant to
Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.
