People v. Ortega
49 A.D.3d 704
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2008

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s *705determination designating him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Imperato, 45 AD3d 659 [2007]; People v Bula, 41 AD3d 569 [2007]). Miller, J.P., Covello, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.