People v. OrdoverPeople v. Ordover
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant‘s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his current “challenge[ ] to the procedures employed by the sentencing court in its determination regarding restitution” (People v Williams, 62 AD3d 730, 731 [2009]; see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280-281 [1992]; People v Alvarez, 57 AD3d 688 [2008]; People v Caba, 238 AD2d 603 [1997]; People v Chatmon, 46 AD3d 833 [2007]; see also People v Owens, 10 AD3d 619 [2004]; cf. People v Travis, 64 AD3d 808 [2009]; People v Lovett, 8 AD3d 1007 [2004]). Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.