People v. OdomPeople v. Odom
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive given, among other things, his remorse and acceptance of responsibility for the crime. However, defendant’s unchallenged waiver of the right to appeal precludes our review of this contention (see People v Guzman-Moore, 144 AD3d 1267, 1268 [2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 949 [2017]; People v Perkins, 140 AD3d 1401, 1403 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1126 [2016]).
Lynch, J.P., Devine, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.