People v. NuesiPeople v. Nuesi
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Notwithstanding that the defendant’s right to counsel had attached, the record supports the hearing court’s finding that the defendant’s statement was spontaneous and not the result of any improper conduct or questioning. Therefore, the statement was properly admitted into evidence (see, People v Gonzales,
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Joy, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.