People v. NoreliusPeople v. Norelius
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the subject mandatory surcharges and fee imposed at sentencing should be waived is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Ruz, 70 NY2d 942, 943 [1988]; People v Francis, 82 AD3d 1263 [2011]; People v Ziolkowski, 9 AD3d 915 [2004]) and, in any event, without merit (see
Rivera, J.P., Austin, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.