People v. Norelius

Jun 1, 2016
2012-08898
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Rivera

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant‘s contention that the subject mandatory surcharges and fee imposed at sentencing should be waived is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Ruz, 70 NY2d 942, 943 [1988]; People v Francis, 82 AD3d 1263 [2011]; People v Ziolkowski, 9 AD3d 915 [2004]) and, in any event, without merit (see CPL 420.35 [2]; People v Jones, 26 NY3d 730 [2016]; People v Bones, 52 AD3d 522, 523 [2008]; People v Domin, 13 AD3d 391, 392 [2004]; People v Owens, 10 AD3d 619 [2004]).

Rivera, J.P., Austin, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.