THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v THOMAS P. NESBITT, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York
November 20, 2008
868 NYS2d 557
Defendant‘s sole contention on this appeal is that the sentences imposed are harsh and excessive. We disagree. Noting defendant‘s extensive criminal history, we discern neither an abuse of discretion by County Court nor the existence of any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentences in the interest of justice (see People v Barringer, 54 AD3d 442, 444 [2008]). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Peters, J.P., Rose, Kane, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
