History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Navis
3 Cal. 106
Cal.
1853
Check Treatment
Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

Where the admission or confession of a party is resorted to as evidence, it is error to exclude any portion of it made at the same time as the part which is related.

For this reason, the judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Navis
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1853
Citation: 3 Cal. 106
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.