People v. NardoPeople v. Nardo
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene County (Fromer, J.), rendered December 12, 1985, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree.
In October 1984 defendant was indicted by a Grand Jury on charges of grand larceny in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. The charges stemmed from his involvement in a scheme with his live-in girlfriend, Ann Nelson. Nelson stole traveler’s checks on almost a daily basis from the vault of the Marine Midland Bank in the Village of Catskill, Greene County, where she was employed as a teller during April and May 1984. Defendant would pick Nelson up outside the bank and then they would
During the same time period, Nelson was also attempting to negotiate various other forged checks which she had obtained in New York City. As a result of evidence gathered in the investigation of Nelson’s various criminal activities, a search warrant was issued authorizing the police to search Nelson’s apartment. Nelson and defendant lived together in the same apartment and, during the search of the apartment, certain evidence incriminating defendant was also obtained.
Nelson was subsequently arrested on charges related to her various criminal activities. She was allowed to enter a favorable plea in exchange for her agreement to testify against defendant. Following a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of the charges of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. This appeal followed.
The first issue raised by defendant is whether certain evidence seized during the search of the apartment which he and Nelson shared should have been suppressed. This evidence was used to corroborate the accomplice testimony of Nelson at trial. Defendant contends that the search warrant application failed to set forth sufficient allegations and reliable factual information for the court to make an independent determination of probable cause (see, People v P. J. Video, 68 NY2d 296, 306-307, cert denied