midpage

People v. NakovicsPeople v. Nakovics

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 28, 1988
Versions:144 A.D.2d 704
535 N.Y.S.2d 29
1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12392

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), rendered May 9, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

At trial, the prosecution improperly elicited photographic identification testimony on direct examination. Defense counsel objected but refrained from making a motion for a mistrial. The defendant contends that the failure to move for a mistrial constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. We disagree. A review of the record reveals that the attorney provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147; see also, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 708-709; People v Harris, 109 AD2d 351).

The defendant’s further contention that he was deprived of a fair trial as a result of the court’s charge is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.15 [2]), and review in the interest of justice is not warranted. Weinstein, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Nakovics
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 28, 1988
Citations: 144 A.D.2d 704; 535 N.Y.S.2d 29; 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12392
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In