History
  • No items yet
midpage
82 A.D.3d 794
N.Y. App. Div.
2011

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v JAMES MURRAY, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York

January 11, 2011

917 N.Y.S.2d 910

In 2003 the defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy in the second degree (Penal Law § 105.15) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and was sentenced to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment. The crimes arose from the same general set of circumstances. In 2009, the defendant moved for resentencing on both convictions pursuant to CPL 440.46. The Supreme Court granted the defendant‘s motion with respect to his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, but found that it was unauthorized under CPL 440.46, which pertains only to sentences imposed for violations of certain crimes under Penal Law article 220, to resentence the defendant on his conviction of conspiracy in the second degree. We affirm the order insofar as appealed from.

By the clear terms of CPL 440.46, a court‘s authority to resentence eligible inmates convicted of a class B drug felony is limited to that felony and class C, D, or E felony offenses defined in Penal Law articles 220 and 221 on which the sentences were imposed at the same time or were included in the same order of commitment (see CPL 440.46 [2]). It does not extend to convictions of other crimes, such as conspiracy in the second degree (cf. People v Diaz, 68 AD3d 497, 498 [2009]).

The defendant‘s remaining contention is without merit.

Rivera, J.P, Balkin, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Murray
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 1, 2011
Citations: 82 A.D.3d 794; 917 N.Y.2d 910
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In