People v. MosesPeople v. Moses
Since defendant did not raise the issue by specific objection, his present claim that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of an accomplice is unpreserved (People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. Police testimony, photographs and physical evidence linked defendant to the crime and fully satisfied the accomplice corroboration requirement (see