People v. MorrishillPeople v. Morrishill
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Balkin
The defendant entered a plea agreement calling for a specified prison term and period of postrelease supervision, and an amount of restitution. The restitution amount represented the amount of “buy money” expended by the police in their purchases of drugs from the defendant (see
Under
Here, the defendant objected to the amount of restitution (see People v Ward, 103 AD3d at 926; cf. People v Finnegan, 112 AD3d 847, 847 [2013]). Moreover, the record was insufficient to establish the proper amount of restitution (see People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d at 145-146). Accordingly, the defendant was entitled to a hearing, and we therefore remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing and new determination concerning the proper amount of restitution and the manner of payment thereof. Balkin, J.P., Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.