midpage

People v. MorilloPeople v. Morillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1996
Versions:225 A.D.2d 479
639 N.Y.S.2d 921
639 N.Y.2d 921
1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3093

Defendant’s contention that the police improperly used his mother and sister "as their agents to coax [him] into speaking” is without merit, since the record indicates that defendant’s spontaneous incriminating statement was the result of a voluntary change of mind (People v Kinnard, 62 NY2d 910), not police action involving the use of his relatives. While the detective had commented to the relatives that defendant "should try to help himself in cooperating”, there is no indication that defendant’s relatives conveyed the detective’s suggestion to defendant. We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. *480Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Morillo
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 26, 1996
Citations: 225 A.D.2d 479; 639 N.Y.S.2d 921; 639 N.Y.2d 921; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3093
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In