History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Morgan
919 N.Y.2d 457
N.Y. App. Div.
2011
Check Treatment

RAFAEL E. LEMOS, Respondent, v GIACOMO MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., Appellants.

[918 NYS2d 877]

Defendant corporation established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). It submitted persuasive evidence of preexisting degenerative bone disease in plaintiff’s left knee that predated the accident, by way of a radiologist’s affirmed report detailing the findings in plaintiff’s MRI film, as well as plaintiff’s physician’s findings of degenerative disease. In opposition, plaintiff failed to meet his burden to adduce evidence rebutting the asserted lack of causation (see Ortiz v Ash Leasing, Inc., 63 AD3d 556 [2009]; Valentin v Pomilla, 59 AD3d 184, 186 [2009]).

In light of the foregoing, defendant’s argument regarding plaintiff’s gap in treatment need not be considered. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Morgan
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 24, 2011
Citation: 919 N.Y.2d 457
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In