midpage

People v. MoorePeople v. Moore

New York Court of Appeals
Sep 2, 2010
Versions:15 N.Y.3d 811
934 N.E.2d 879
908 N.Y.S.2d 146
2010 NY Slip Op 6532

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant Isham Moore failed to establish that his attorney provided ineffective assistance because of her failure to request a justification charge. There are sound strategic reasons for counsel’s decision not to request such a charge. And even if this were not the case, defendant cannot show that he was entitled to a justification charge under any favorable interpretation of the testimony presented at trial.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Moore
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 2, 2010
Citations: 15 N.Y.3d 811; 934 N.E.2d 879; 908 N.Y.S.2d 146; 2010 NY Slip Op 6532
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In