People v. MonahanPeople v. Monahan
Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Having failed to move for the suppression of physical evidence on the ground that the warrantless search of his car at the police station constituted an improper inventory search, the defendant’s instant contention in this regard is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Dickens,
Equally unavailing is the defendant’s assertion that the court erred in failing to deliver an adverse inference charge due to the destruction of Rosario material (see, People v Rosario,
The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, devoid of merit. Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.