midpage

People v. MiddletonPeople v. Middleton

New York Court of Appeals
Feb 17, 2009
Versions:12 N.Y.3d 737
904 N.E.2d 499

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs.

Defendant’s constitutional arguments are unpreserved. The record supports the determination of the courts below that defendant is a level three sex offender.

Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Middleton
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 17, 2009
Citations: 12 N.Y.3d 737; 904 N.E.2d 499
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In