History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Menna
38 N.Y.2d 850
NY
1976
Check Treatment

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

The Supreme Court of the United States has held that this defendant’s claim of double jeopardy survived his plea of guilty (Menna v State of New York, 423 US 61). On review of such claim on the merits we conclude, with the concurrence of the prosecutor, that the double jeopardy clause precludes the prosecution of defendant on the charge to which he pleaded guilty.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

On reargument: Order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Menna
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 20, 1976
Citation: 38 N.Y.2d 850
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.