People v. McMillanPeople v. McMillan
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered November 7, 1990, convicting defendant, after jury
In light of defendant’s attempts to paint a picture of the police observation and arrest procedures testified to herein as suspect, the trial court properly admitted police testimony explaining a customary use of those procedures (People v Almodovar,
The trial court’s summary denial of defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of misconduct during jury deliberations was an appropriate exercise of discretion. Defendant’s motion papers contained only conclusory allegations that the incident in question constituted an "improper influence” on the jury verdict, and the dropping of a bag of candy (a common occurrence within life experience) cannot reasonably be viewed as determinative of the ultimate issue in this case, which was whether defendant criminally possessed crack cocaine with the intent to sell it, and upon which issue the People offered overwhelming evidence (People v Brown,
We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.