The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. Defendant is not entitled to suppression on the ground that the lineup should have been conducted in sequential fashion, as the attorney attending the lineup had requested. We know of no authority for the proposition that failure to employ a sequential procedure may be a basis for suppression of a lineup (see Matter of Thomas,
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes,
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.
