THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v DONALD McKINNON, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department
June 2, 2009
883 N.Y.S.2d 2
We find that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), was legally sufficient to establish that the victim sustained a permanently disfiguring scar on her arm as a result of being bitten by defendant (see People v Felice, 45 AD3d 1442 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 764 [2008]; People v Kenney, 291 AD2d 331 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 638 [2002]), and that defendant had the intent to cause such injury (
Supreme Court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences, since defendant bit the victim after, and independent of, the events that constituted the kidnapping (see People v Simpson, 209 AD2d 281, 282 [1994]).
